273
loft to the Registrar. But as I informed Your Excellency in my letter of 14th April, 1908, I exercised my power of control by directing that my Clerk should not sit in Courts as Deputy Registrar. And quite recently I discovered the Deputy Registrar in Court reading a novel. I intimated, which is a mild form of putting an order, that that officer would not be required to attend in Court again.
Generally it can hardly be contended that if I found one Deputy Registrar more capable of performing the Court work than another, I should not have the right to say he was to do it.
All these instances relate to the routine work of the office, which is inseparably connected with the administration of justice: it lies altogether outside the distribution of business in the Supreme Court under S. 22 and S. 32 of Ordinance No. 3 of 1873: which refers to Court work, not official or routine work of the Department. Even in so simple a matter as the routine work of the office control is essential, as the following example will show. When the Consul-General of Canton, in some recent correspondence, referred to a letter to the Registry written by his predecessor on the subject under discussion, I sent for the file of letters, and could not find...
SYS
ha. Lähdxa - [* 02 . Kod it bur^90 BABO
273
loft to the Registrar. But as I informed Your Excellency in
* O*
JACK BONN orla
my lester of 14th. April, 1908, I exercised rgy power of
Isolda tu AVS. 8 85W
. Jnaxe пle:"ao A 07 .Brokdonsib
control by directing that my Clark should not set in
og hari æeizinan net dat
Courts as Deputy Registrar. And quite recently I discovered
Ogow Jnel as I A 2. Oda Rondo 1993 JAPAČ SR AN OJ AMOO
the Deputy Registrar in Court reading a novel
I intimat-
.DI to wives sifa eds) or as er notunerih ter boaza-
I Jue
•Insyong IIIs and backTM
$
KINNAR TURO
I
་
1
{
dura:lly blvors
03 arcob-HAÏ .1
hotabto UVA
-ed, which is a mild form of putting an order,
that that
officer would not be required to attend in Court again.
Generally it can hardly be contended that if I found one
Deputy Registrar more capable of performing the Court
Work
than another, I should not have the right to say he was to
0.
uvs hípom Irable no te ፍ
J JAN bubaroo ad
do it.
•MOURUYOR sux du sonscatans 8:3 NOVai od
era ezitch' Jɛl` nen ei
nari in cor and coltm?”.
I swiv nisaloony, al rosq8en NotW SAVE zainoff offt mi
ati od bestoben el on on od revoy arfa hus (berbalo ovar
8020
1
(3 mi nolenseño» v! Lenizens tebro erft to Xero ang
2 & Jua
*
TOMLEVOD and Pont bevisen viseengxs
Tuncaknon stil og stef al molt to crid el How
All these instances relate to the routine
work of the office, which is inseparably connected with
the administration of justice: it lies altogether outside
the distribution of business in the Supreme Court under
S. 22 and S. 32 of Ordinance No. 3 of 1873: which refers
to Court work, not official or routine work of the De-
-partment. Even in so simple a matter as the routine work
of the office control is essential, as the following
example will show. When the Consul-General of Canton, in
some recent correspondence, referred to a letter to the
riv XO XTOU SHE
verby well Iontros oJ SI-
vffarrior æl xh
[
.endol pl somshmiðis ei ustreliyor ytinged
Registry written by his predecessor on the subject under
discussion, I sent for the file of latvers, and could not
rind
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.